Solar Loan Complaints: GoodLeap, Dividend, Mosaic & More
Comprehensive guide to solar loan complaints against major lenders. GoodLeap, Dividend Finance, Mosaic, Sunlight Financial — what borrowers allege and your legal options.
Quick answer: Solar loan complaints usually involve a mismatch between the sales pitch, the installation contract, and the lender's loan documents. If your complaint involves GoodLeap, Dividend Finance, Mosaic, Sunlight Financial, GreenSky, WebBank, Cross River Bank, or another solar lender, collect the loan agreement, TILA disclosure, installer contract, production records, and complaint history before asking the lender, CFPB, state attorney general, or attorney to review it.
This page catalogs common complaint patterns involving major solar lenders and explains what documents and legal theories homeowners should understand. Treat lender-specific statements as public allegations or record checkpoints, not proof that every borrower has the same claim.
Disclaimer: This article is informational, not legal advice.
The Solar Financing Landscape
| Lender or platform | Public record checkpoints | What to verify |
|---|---|---|
| GoodLeap | Minnesota AG lawsuit, lender disclosures, arbitration clause | Whether the loan amount, dealer fee, and installer conduct match the sales pitch |
| Dividend Finance | Minnesota AG lawsuit, Fifth Third ownership, loan paperwork | Whether the lender or installer disclosed financing costs and cancellation rights |
| Mosaic | Minnesota AG lawsuit, consumer complaints, installer relationship | Whether the application and amount financed were authorized and accurate |
| Sunlight Financial | Minnesota AG lawsuit, bankruptcy/servicing history | Who currently owns or services the loan and how disputes are handled |
| GreenSky | CFPB enforcement history for unauthorized loans in home improvement | Whether the borrower authorized the credit application and merchant charges |
| WebBank or Cross River Bank | Bank-of-record relationships in fintech lending | Which entity originated, owns, services, or reports the loan |
The Core Complaint Pattern
Across all lenders, borrowers report the same pattern:
- Dealer fees hidden in the loan amount — The financed price may be higher than the cash price because fees are embedded in the system price.
- Misrepresented savings — Sales reps promise "free solar" or "the loan payment will be less than your electric bill"
- System underperformance — Actual energy production may fall materially below the proposal or guarantee.
- Lender refuses cancellation — Borrowers told "you signed the contract, pay us"
- Arbitration clauses block court access — Most financing agreements require private arbitration, often with the lender choosing the forum
Lender-by-Lender Complaint Breakdown
GoodLeap
Primary borrower complaints:
- Alleged undisclosed dealer fees inflating the loan principal
- Financing applications submitted without borrower knowledge or consent
- Arbitration clause designating JAMS, with borrowers reporting difficulty navigating the process
- Minnesota AG named GoodLeap as co-defendant in 2024 consumer fraud action
Dividend Finance
Primary borrower complaints:
- High-pressure door-to-door sales paired with Dividend financing
- Escalator clauses in PPA/lease agreements
- Difficulty obtaining loan documentation after signing
- Minnesota AG co-defendant; owned by Fifth Third Bank
Mosaic
Primary borrower complaints:
- Loan approvals based on installer representations rather than borrower verification
- Dealer-fee structure similar to GoodLeap
- Customer service delays when borrowers report installer problems
- Minnesota AG co-defendant
Sunlight Financial
Primary borrower complaints:
- Dealer-fee financing model tied to now-bankrupt installers (Titan, Pink Energy)
- Filed Chapter 11 in May 2024, emerged as reorganized entity
- Borrowers report confusion about who holds their loan post-bankruptcy
- Minnesota AG lawsuit specifically addresses dealer-fee disclosures
Full Sunlight Financial investigation
Key Legal Theories
1. FTC Holder Rule (16 CFR § 433)
Most solar financing agreements include a notice stating: "ANY HOLDER OF THIS CONSUMER CREDIT CONTRACT IS SUBJECT TO ALL CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WHICH THE DEBTOR COULD ASSERT AGAINST THE SELLER OF GOODS OR SERVICES."
This means you can raise your installer's misconduct against the lender.
2. State UDAP (Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices)
Every state has a consumer protection statute. In Texas, it's the DTPA. In Florida, it's FDUTPA. In California, it's the CLRA. Some laws include fee-shifting or enhanced-remedy provisions depending on the claim, proof, and result.
3. TILA (Truth in Lending Act)
TILA requires accurate disclosure of finance charges, APR, and total loan cost. If dealer fees were not properly disclosed, TILA claims may apply. TILA also provides a right of rescission in certain circumstances.
4. Arbitration Challenges
Many solar financing agreements require arbitration through JAMS, AAA, or another forum. Arbitration rules, filing fees, and fee-shifting depend on the specific contract and forum rules. Review the clause before assuming court is available.
Sources and Official References
- Minnesota Attorney General: lawsuit against solar lenders over alleged hidden fees
- FTC and federal partners: consumer warning on solar scams
- CFPB: submit a complaint
- FTC: Holder Rule
- Cornell Legal Information Institute: UCC Article 9 secured transactions
What Documents to Gather
- Your financing agreement (the loan contract — critical)
- Your installation contract with the installer
- Truth in Lending disclosure (TILA box showing APR, finance charge, total of payments)
- Monthly statements from the lender
- Any correspondence with the lender about complaints or disputes
- Production/savings data showing actual vs. promised performance
FAQ
Can I cancel my solar loan if the system doesn't work?
You cannot unilaterally cancel the loan, but you can assert claims and defenses against the lender under the FTC Holder Rule. This can result in loan cancellation, damages, or both — but it requires legal action, not just a phone call.
What if my lender sold my loan to another company?
Your rights under the FTC Holder Rule and state UDAP laws travel with the loan. The new holder is subject to the same claims and defenses. Notify any new servicer in writing that you have pending disputes.
Do I need a lawyer to dispute a solar loan?
For informal complaints, you can file with the CFPB, your state AG, or the lender directly. For loan cancellation, damages, arbitration, or lien issues, an attorney review is often important because deadlines and remedies depend on the documents.
What if the lender also goes bankrupt?
If a lender, installer, or servicer enters bankruptcy, your options may shift to bankruptcy notices, claim deadlines, successor servicers, or defenses against collection. Preserve every notice and ask for legal advice before missing a deadline.
All Lender Investigations
Related Resources
Next Research Steps
Use these resources to connect this issue with the broader solar scam pattern, the relevant legal framework, and the next practical action.
Solar panel scams
Start with the main solar panel scams guide for the broad definition and recovery roadmap.
Solar financing fraud compensation
Use this guide for loan, dealer-fee, payment-jump, PACE, lease, and lender-defense issues.
Homeowner legal rights
Review cancellation, rescission, UDAP, TILA, Holder Rule, arbitration, and lawsuit options.
Report solar fraud
Build a complaint packet for the FTC, CFPB, state attorney general, licensing board, or counsel.